Post #149 #The Prince"

Power demands weakness. Power needs weakness. Power comes out of and is created by the roiling energy of the void. Power relates to the negative energy that caused creation. Power flows from the energy of division. Power, that is also the turbulent, relentless energy of division, needs weakness, and also needs to affirm itself through conquest. Here the attitude of the masculine displays its utter disdain for weakness, the feminine, and cannot even give it the acknowledgement of its existence by using it as the exercise of its energy. In truth, the male hates the female which represents weakness to him....his weakness, the weakness of humanity. Power must conquer! Power must have an enemy! Power will create its enemy! Power is weakness so it greatly despises itself and created female to absorb the self-hatred. The female...the scapegoat. Power creates its enemy because power must struggle that it may overcome and win that it may assume its proper and fitting place and position. That position, as well noted in mythology and religion, is nothing less than the position of the royal prince who seeks and desires to inherit the kingdom, the prince who desires and chooses to sit at the right hand of God, the prince of power who will become God. This prince can inherit the kingdom only after he disposes of his father, the reigning king. (after he disposes of God). Through the actions of the prince, the king loses respect and takes on his vulnerable, takes on his weakness, takes on the  feminine, and dies. The prince inherits at his father's death.

As the Reality had to be done away with, the king also had to be done away with, and so the mythological story of the prince speaks with the truth that we have, indeed, created death. Now the trick is for us to create life. Its all a matter of survival. We will create life, first through religion and when that fails, through science. Creating life has been until now the means of imitating the Power over death. The male has the power to create life so the attraction of the sexual act for the male, plus, of course, acquiring control over the feminine. The act of sex confirms for the male his claim to his father's kingdom, confirms his claim to be the God of Creation. It boils down to killing the reigning king and rescuing the maiden..... for his own pleasure and use. Besides the father, now reduced to the feminine, the maiden also becomes the prince's victim as she succumbs to his desires. As she is sexually taken by the prince, she becomes his victim and his enemy, so he can and does defeat her. Once taken by him, she also dies to him, her only value as virgin lost. She is no longer the prize. She no longer has value. She now is simply the convenient receptacle and nurturer of his seed.

Post #148 "The Celebration of the Masculine"

This celebration of creation, this celebration of the masculine, this celebration of power, is affirmed and celebrated by, not only the masculine itself, but surprisingly, also by the feminine. Women today would be repelled by such a thought because they feel that they have fought for and achieved equality. No male sincerely considers the female an actual, equal human being in the same sense as the male considers himself and other males as human beings. The feminine is so convinced and genetically implanted with her role as female that she is mostly oblivious to this fact and would actually deny the fact if confronted with it. In all ways, the feminine has been designed and programmed to be the receptacle and nurturer of the masculine, to be the enabler, to be that weakness that creates and sustains power. As hot would not be hot without cold and up would not be up without down, so male would not be male if female would not be female. Women affirm this division in all the ways of their lives. In today's culture many women imitate men in looks and actions. Its a matter of survival really, and women generally struggle much more with survival than men. Women see this desire to imitate men as a rebellion to male domination but the fact that rebellion is necessary further strengthens the duality.One only rebels against the reason for rebelling.

Obviously, equality was not a given in male estimation.To a male, women's imitation of him is seen as envy. As Consciousness envies Reality, the female continues the process of division and envies the male.Its the same story but on a different level of creation. Nothing is as affirming to one's ego as being envied. Women imitate men as an act of appeasement, as an attempt to be enduring, and as a means of survival....survival--the quest for immortality. Contemporary womanhood feels that it has argued and been granted equality, but what is equal and accepted  need not be argued for. What women have really achieved is a nonchalant humoring by males, that, to a man, is no threat. Every man knows that no woman can ever be accepted as a real equal , but it is a fine game to play and plays up masculine strength and further makes women more ridiculous and consequently weaker and weaker. The female imitation  of the masculine qualities enhances the masculine idea of representative of God, particularly in the patriarchal societies throughout history.

Feminine imitation of the masculine is worship. As God is desired and imaged, so the female images the masculine further promoting the masculine as the transference of God into Man and Man into God. The qualities that humanity has created to determine the essence of their God, are the qualities of masculinity, all encapsulated  in Power. The qualities used to describe God are the same qualities of the masculine taken to the highest power; taken to the degree of perfection, masculine perfection. Interestingly, whereas Reality is Entity, the image, the God of Creation. is one part, the masculine, devouring the other part, the feminine, or one race bent on destroying another, or one religion dominating through all degree of control, abuse, and war. What clarification of the proof of the process of division.

Post #147 "Power and Weakness"

Post #147  "Power and Weakness"

Power always seeks out weakness for power cannot be power if weakness does not exist.

The extent and measure of power is in direct proportion to the extent and measure of weakness. The more weakness can be brought down to its knees, the more power can rise and generate more power, more of itself.

Power generates power but only at the expense of weakness as in vulnerability.

From this abuse, weakness eventually sees itself only in the context of being that which is the food and nourishment of power.

The feminine, eventually, through ages of evolution, can only see herself in this role of vulnerability and subjectiveness.

Every level of Time throughout history sees the feminine more and more consumed by her role and more deceived by it.

Today's female would loudly protest, and say that she has indeed come a long way to emancipation, but she is deceiving herself for the truth is too awful to deal with.

Creation is a celebration of power.

Religion is a celebration of creation.

Consequently and essentially, religion is a celebration of the masculine for the masculine {Power) is the first cause image of the God of Creation.

Power is the first celebrated attribute of God......' God of power, God of might.'

As the masculine is the image of God, the feminine is the reflection of the masculine or, in other words, the reflection of image.

The feminine is the reflection of the image of the masculine.... the male imitates God, the female imitates the male.

Today's version of women's equality is trying to be male-like.

Women imitate the male because they have no idea what it is to be who they are.

If male and female are divided amoeba, the feminine is half amoeba.

But amoeba is undivided.

If male and female are divided amoeba, undivided amoeba would have absolutely no difference, or distinction or dividing marks because there is no division.

If there were no division would there just be a uni-sex?

Maybe this is where its heading with the growing prevalence of homosexuality.

Each level or layer of reflection, becomes more distorted and inverted. throughout the layers of history. 

As the masculine is the distorted and inverted image of the God he seeks to imitate, so too, the feminine is the distorted and inverted image of the masculine.

She seeks to imitate the masculine as he is the image of God on earth, the essence of power, the power necessary to survival.

The feminine....taken from the weak 'side' of the male, the weak side of the powerful...not created but 'taken'.

(Masculine here, refers to a much more basic and fundamental meaning than man as in 'man and woman'.

Here, masculine refers to first causes of the duality that eventually brings about the division resulting from the division of amoeba into male and female, then extending to the division into race, into nationality, into religion, etc.)

Creation is a celebration of the essence of power over weakness, consequently its a celebration of masculinity.

This division of man from amoeba is the image of God and is thereby the God of Creation, the archetype of humanity.

Post #146 "Is the Masculine Enticed?"

Sin was created as a means of controlling the non-elite, the commonality, the masses. Religion wrote the bible. The bible could be viewed as the story of humanity's sin which ends in humanity's redemption. In the biblical story of creation, Eve enticed Adam so that he could not resist eating the forbidden fruit. The story accuses someone as being at fault. The story, religion, says Eve was at fault. The story, religion, and then the church, say Eve sinned. The story, religion, and then the church say there was no such thing as sin until the moment Eve took the apple and gave it to Adam. The story, religion, and the church say that Eve created sin. Eve brought sin into creation and into the world. Where, between the fashioning of Eve from the rib of Adam, could Eve ever have assumed or taken on the qualities to do this most disastrous of all acts? What germs could she have picked up to do this in the idyllic Garden of Eden, where they daily, walked and talked with God? Adam was not at fault, the story goes. Adam was enticed  by Eve. Sexual overtones are obvious at this point. So Eve and sex are at the bottom of sin in the world. Of course, now we know why amoeba was divided into male and female. (Amoeba can subdivide, no problem for reproduction here) It would be facetious to suppose that anyone was at the scene recording it for history. This biblical story of Adam and Eve was written in a particular place in history by a particular person or sect for a particular issue or from a particular point of view. It certainly is not recorded history and falls into the category of religious myth. It was written to promote a patriarchal society. It was written to demonize. The demonization of women was embellished and promoted by the early church. The early church is the basis of much organized religion and many sects today. It the basis for what is coming to light in the world wide pedophilia scandal.

This mythical, biblical story was written to make Eve, as representative of the feminine responsible for bringing sin/evil into the world. Eve was created to be a source of power, to provide energy/power  to feed and thereby empower the male. This is reflected in gender roles. Eve was created as food to feed the hungry. Sin was thereby established to replay the secondary level of the process of division/the duality of humanity to God (non-reality to Reality being the first or basic level) ---- humanity to God,---- Adam assuming the role of God,----- Eve given the role of the image of God---humanity. Eve thereby provided (through the symbol of eating) Adam with food. Scientifically, Adam took from Eve her positive/generative energy. Eve thereby provided Adam with the means to become God. Adan took and ate the fruit with the desire and expectation of becoming God. This is clearly spelled out in the Garden Story. Adam derived the power from Eve, in addition to his own, to become God by devouring Eve's essence. If Adam fed off of Eve's essence, where does sin lie? Did Adam not sin seriously against Eve? Another question surfaces... did Adam sin or was Adam just acting like Adam? If Adam is just being Adam, did sin occur? If Adam is just being Adam and just acting as Adam, how could sin occur? If a wild animal mauls or devours its trainer, does the animal sin? Most would say 'no'. No, of course not. The animal isn't vicious or violent. It is just acting like a wild animal. Its just being what it is. As humanity is of creation and subject to its function as the process of division...can humanity act other than what it is? Can the female recover if this is who she is? Can the male survive without devouring a form of food/energy? What if amoeba has never divided? But then.....creation is the process of division

Post #145 "Sex and Sin"

What else could be determined from this consideration, when, according to religion, women are thought to be incapable of all the most prized masculine virtues such as logic or incapable of possessing power. These opinions are very obvious in the writings of the early church fathers who have been canonized as saints of the church. The fact that there are religious denominations that still refuse to ordain women/allow women unto their hierarchy, gives rise to the fact that in order to be socially acceptable in today's world, the church has put on the pretense that it has finally placed the female in the category of accepted and acceptable humanity

Sin is seen by religion as a lowering of one's self worth, of one's souls worth. Sin was seen as a lowering of the masculine by being lured into perverse acts that were not really of his own nature or worthy of his nature. This makes it unacceptable for married men, that is, men married to women as opposed to men married to men, to also not be acceptable for ordination in those same religious denominations. These men are seen as sinning through touching the feminine of the female species as in an accepted marriage, which is comparable to becoming unclean by touching a corpse in early religious belief. If the masculine touched the feminine of the male, as in homosexuality, it is seen as God worship. This is the basis and foundation on which the idea of sin is founded. Surly this is why most sins can be traced to being sexual in nature; sexual sins being the most secret and perverse. When sin is seen as representational, sin doesn't exist because one does not act out of the chosen status of God's image and so does not sin against God. As self, one can only act as self, meaning to act as one is. If there is no desire to be like God, which is the same as desiring to be God, one has no knowledge of sin. To them, sin does not exist.

This god/God of religion is represented as holy, meaning without sin. This Gospel is said to give responsibility to the church for saving souls of sinners. Religion could be said to control and direct God's power of redemption, to have the power to loose and bind, to forgive sins. Interestingly, several Gnostic Gospels say there is no such thing as sin. The creation and use of 'sin' can be seen as an effort to access through control,...through creating the power of sin. Sin compounds as the process of division breaks down with the process of division of creation.

Post #144 ".The Masculine, the Feminine, and Sin"

The question as to what denotes sin looms menacingly. Is sin intentional or is sin representational? Do we sin through the intention to sin or do we sin because of our circumstances; through who we are? To look deeper into this issue of sin and how this effects the issue of masculine and feminine, let's return once more to the biblical/mythological Garden of Eden story. Did Adam sin in eating the apple or was he lured into eating the apple? If he ate the apple intentionally he was fully responsible, however, if he was lured into eating the apple against his better judgement, he was less responsible. No doubt, Eve is fully responsible not only for herself but also for having enticed Adam. Of course, all of this has sexual implications. The stance taken by the church is obvious. The sin was on the female, even before sin existed, even before the apple was eaten. The man was incapable of sinning on his own. Religion has presented sin differently in different circumstances dependant on the male view or the female view, believer or non-believer, powerful or vulnerable, Christian or Jew. white or black, rich or poor. Is it a matter of sin or does sin depend on who you are?

The masculine, as representative of God is able to be lured into sin through the wiles of the feminine. The sin is the sin of the feminine. The feminine becomes sin. Sin becomes the feminine. The masculine is created in God's image (the feminine is created in Adam's image from a rib in his side) and as such are Sons of God and heirs of God's kingdom. As God's sons and heirs, the masculine is said by religion to be incapable of sinning on his own. Sin cannot possible reside in him. Religion has presented sin as representational, that the feminine is inferior to the male and not only inferior but opposite, If the male is human the female is not human but sub-human, incapable of thinking or able to be trusted on her own. She must be kept out of the market place and confined to the rooms of her home, bearing children. Sin is representational of who she is. Keep in mind here, that the early church, according to documented church history, considers only the masculine as true humanity and the feminine as sub-human. An example would be the philosophy of Augustine, a canonized saint of the church, (The Philosophy of Augustine pps354-430) who equated women with sexuality which was considered inferior to men's ability to contemplate God through Reason and also as reflecting the image of God. It said that women were created for sexual service, hence their bodies reflected only sexual function. Further, the church said that women were incapable of Reason, hence, incapable of thinking or controlling their own impulses. Is there any wonder that history is filled with the abuse and degradation of women. As the church set the moral code the church is responsible.

Post #143 "Breaking Down to Nothingness"

Consciousness that lies in the future is certainly aware that the power-struggle games are not working. This fact is buried deep in the common and individual psychic as Time is nebulous. Beneath all the layers of lies throughout history, the Truth remains that Reality is Reality and image is image. The role-playing game of God/Male contrasted by other-than-God /female thereby renders the strong stronger and the weak weaker.The weak becoming weaker and weaker until, as atoms, breaking down into smaller and smaller subatomic particles, they, likewise break down into smaller and smaller pieces. As atoms lose all definition until they finally just pass away, so too the weak lose all definition, and also, finally, just pass away. The weak and oppressed become unable to survive much less fight back or retain any sense of human dignity for there is no room for human dignity in being the fodder for other's greedy appetites. In other words, the powerful need the life-blood of the weak to survive. The strong could never rise to Power without sapping off the life of that which is other than themselves, that which is vulnerable.

There is nothing inherently strong in needing to take strength from others. This need to drain the weak shows that the so-called powerful are weak themselves and are unable to admit, even to themselves, that they are not of Reality. When the strength from the weak and the vulnerable has been depleted, the powerful will always create more vulnerability to feed upon until only one remains----the most Powerful....... ..The God of Creation/the Collective Consciousness and the Collective Unconsciousness. The God of Creation will then recall Reality and begin to dream. The dream will bring about desire and desire will bring about The Choice to become that which image is not and the abyss will begin to stir and then to rage. Energy. Heat. Water.....the primordial waters of Nothingness....Future creating Past.