We've heard it said......"There has to be a reason why there is something rather than nothing".........Sure, unless we do not understand what is 'something' and what is 'nothing'. What if what we think is 'something' is really 'nothing', which is the case. 'Something' is 'something' only to that which is of the same information, the same dimension, the same 'somethingness'. If an image, (now this image, of course, thinks of itself as 'something' and not an image because this is its reality and the only reality it knows) defines reality, it defines its own reality, the reality it has created. This determines where it searches and what it searches for. Let's call this image, image A. Image A creates for this is what images do and produces another image. Its easy to see that what results is still only image, because image B, created by image A, is created out of the energy, the substance, the information, from image A. Image B and can only image Image A but with its own variant for images can never exactly reproduce. In other words, Image B receives and is made up of information from image A plus its individual touch as a choosing consciousness. That which Image A sees as 'something' is of the same 'somethingness' as Image A...all still image, all still 'nothing'. Image A and Image B can then, cooperatively, choose to caste combined information into Image C. Now A, B, and C can caste combined information into as many combinations of further images according to choice, for choosing is the action of consciousness.... all chosen, all combinations of image, all varieties of image, yet still image. Image, yes, but not image to itself. Image sees itself within its own created reality, its own created 'somethingness'. But, what is image but nothingness---no matter how many combinations and developments are created (creation meaning made out of nothing, nothing meaning image). When answers are sought to why there is something rather than nothing, the answer is sought in the dimension created by images A to Z....all viewed within its own dimension. But, interestingly, image/consciousness/intelligence is not satisfied with answers from within its own reality. Image is seeking answers to what can only be answered from outside of the created dimension or created space. (Dimension is not a good representative word to use in this situation but when trying to describe that which is not easily expressible in our created dimension, words become stumbling blocks, particularly the written word.)
Image has created a dimension that remains within the choice of consciousness. Consciousness views itself from within its created space, its created dimension--that universe of Space, Time, and Matter. We seek answers from within that dimension, that creation, and become confused with what is Real, with what is 'Something'. We become confused from determining what is 'something' from that which is created/'nothing'. Intelligence must be able to step aside from its own created dimension, through its choice, to see outside of and beyond its creation. The created lies within Reality but is protected by its walls of Space, Time, and Matter--the stuff of creation. These walls can be very heavy and unmovable or as wispy as haze and breath. 'Something' can only be Reality. Consciousness has a vague inkling of Reality through its own properties of 'Nothingness'. 'Nothingness' sees its divisiveness, as in broken pieces, and searches for Entity. 'Nothingness' sees its death and finiteness and searches for Infinity. Entity and Infinity do not lie within the realm of the created. Such confusion! If only intelligence would admit it is not the 'Somethingness' of Reality, then maybe it could find the answers that it futilely searches for.
No comments:
Post a Comment