Post #180 "The projection of God"

The transference of humanity into God takes place as God is the image of humanity. God is created in the image of mankind. As Intelligence imagines Perfection, humanity's idea of Perfection becomes its God. Humanity images its own image of God. Imaging is done through transference. The transference of humanity into Reality cannot take place in Reality, as Reality is Reality and image is image. Only in dream and desire does the transference take place. A resultant projected image cannot become its own original. The image of God that results is actually the image of one's interpretation and impression of God. Hence, God becomes image. God becomes the image of humanity, the image of creation. Reality remains Reality. The projection of the desire to become God results in the image which is made up of one's own interpretation of who and what God is and especially what they need and desire God to be. God becomes archetype. In order for humanity to believe in the God it has created, it must do away with anything that goes beyond. This means confining God to what intelligence has created god to be. God must be confined. But it is not only God that must be confined within the limits of intelligence, creation itself must be confined within the limit and limitations of creation. God and creation can only be what intelligence allows it to be. Nothing can exist that does not begin within Time, Place, and Matter. Nothing can exist that lies outside the dreams and desires of intelligence. Until intelligence dreams and desires and images, alternate life or alternate dimensions do not exist.

The first step to becoming God after the dream and the desire is the determination of what qualities are desired. Which qualities are the one that will bring about Perfection as God is Perfection? The most obvious characteristics that seem to be universally desired are those characteristics that are considered the best and the most God-like, as in All-knowing, All-mighty, All-powerful, Most exalted and on and on. It doesn't take long, however, to realize that Perfection, the Perfection of God, does not exist in creation. The only way to become Perfect is to seek for Perfection outside creation. Not knowing what exists outside creation, we rely on our ability to create which is the same as to image. We dream. We desire. We image. We exist within our imaging. Our images are our creation. We do not know what is outside of creation. We do not even know that there is an outside-of-creation. We can only surmise what we long for. No wonder we do not know satisfaction and keep on longing.

"Post # 179 "Who, Really, is God?"

Who is God? Really! Who or What is God? Is God who God is, or is God who we make God out to be? Can we know that which we call, God? Can we name God and call God....God? When we say that God is in our lives, is that God the Reality or is that God that which we have determined God to be? Didn't the word 'god' come from ancient personifications of nature and the need to appease that which was feared? Do we not still try to appease that same fear? Basically, that fear is the fear of the unknown. Is not the fear of God, basically, the fear of the unknown? After all, God is the author of life and the controller of death. Was not that need to appease the unknown, the root of what we think of as worship? Is not worship a form of appeasement meant to soften God, to make God approachable, to form a relationship with God to do.....to do what?...to be our servant, to provide for us and grant our wishes, to give us power beyond our own finite power, to give us the power of God? Does not worship give us the right to the Name of our God, to be the God we claim and possess as our own even to leading us into battle ...and of course, to winning the war so we can fight in that God's name???  and make this God responsible for declaring war? And what about the other side, that side we are waring and fighting against, somehow they seem to be claiming the power of the same God, and are fighting, as we are, in that same God's Name under the same God's banner and for the same God's purpose.......Is this God, Reality, or is this God the God we have created? Its like we not only desire to become God but that we desire to become the God we have created. Our God seems to have all the same goals we do.,, in fact, seems to have the same characteristics.....seems to want what we want and to reject what we reject. This God we have created seems to have the same thoughts as we do that seem to concentrate on war, on 'besting'. on competition and winning everything at any cost, including, throughout history, more than billions and billions of lives. Something just is not adding up. If on the other hand we say that God is a God of Love, that God is a God of Life....now things really do not add up. The God of love would never admonish killing and torture, would never admonish competition that says 'I am better than you and I am going to prove it.' We would never see the God of Love and Life at sport competitions or any of the events that call forth worship.....worship of all the gods we have created, to whom we do homage, under whose banners we claim to march and begin wars for and die for. It just does not make sense...this God we have raised and then,  in God's own Name, thrown into the dirt as we march on over slain victims, killed to honor and obey our God.

We seek perfection. We seek God's Perfection. Its in our genetic make-up. Perfection is what we determine perfection to be and the definition is not always the same to everyone. To become perfect, to become God, for God and perfection are the same, we need to determine the qualities that we see Perfection made up of. Because we see God as all-powerful, power is the quality we seek to become Perfect, to become God. This need to be powerful, the most powerful,.... to be beyond the power of creation, to the power of God. Here we see that Perfection and God are the same thing. And in desiring Perfection, we desire to become God. There lies deep within humanity the desire to become God. The desire is meant to be hidden and denied. No one will admit to wanting to become God. What would people think? It is safer to admit to wanting to be perfect. In fact, this seeking for perfection has been turned into an asset and training begins very early in life. Training to be Perfect is our life. Its our culture. Its what we do. Its who we are. So who is God? What is God? Is there a Real God or just the God we have created? Does Reality have or need a God? Reality is Reality. We can't name it or change it or possess it. It is just there if we allow if to be. And if we do not allow it to be nothing is changed. Reality still Is...just not for us. Its just a matter of Choice, really.

Post #178 "The Creation of God"

In the projection of Reality onto the surface called earth, called universe, called creation...what happens to Reality? What happens to the original...the one that is imaged? What becomes of the original if the projection is successful? If the image of the Reality sees itself as that Reality, could that original continue to exist? The answer is "no", the original could not be allowed to exist, especially to the image, for if it remained, the image would always be the image. The image does not desire to be an image but to be the original, to be that which has entity, to be that which had infinity. But what happens? What really happens? Could there be an exchange of places between an original and its image? Could the image become that Reality, become that desired God? If so, what happens to reality? What happens to God/Reality? We know that Reality cannot be projected, but creation does not know this, or if it does know it way down deep, it surly cannot risk admitting it. So going from the viewpoint of the created, what does Intelligence suppose happens to Reality that it believes it has traded places with? And by trading places, means doing away with Reality. For the image to be successful in fulfilling desire, the original must be done away with. The image must be killed or in some way utterly destroyed.

When the desire to become God, to become the Reality, projects into space, it returns as an image  rather than as transference had taken place as intended. The energy of desire projects into space, churns the primordial waters, and returns as it cannot penetrate the walls of its own creation. The desire cannot attain access to Reality as Reality lies beyond the walls of creation and so returns to its sender as an image of the sender's own attributes. When the desire is to become God, to become Reality, the desire cannot attain to God's Reality. The desire to become God, to become Reality returns as an image of the desired in the desirers' characteristics. The result is very distorted and actually the opposite of that which is desired. Where infinity was the main desire, finiteness resulted. Where entity was desired, brokenness resulted, where knowledge of love was desired, hatred, competition and wars resulted. The desire to become Reality creates God as the image of Reality rather than the desired perfection of a successful transference based on Intelligence's ideas and dreams and desires, based on Intelligence's preconceived ideas of Perfection ,and hence, of God.

The result of the projection of Reality onto and into Intelligence is creation. All that has been created is the image of the intention to become what one is not. The image is returned to the one desiring transference who now, incorrectly, identifies with the image as self. The image is a reflection of what the person assumes is God, and incorrectly setting God into the position of Reality rather than the archetype of one's own dreams and desires. The person imitates and becomes their own interpretation of God rather than actually becoming Reality for they have God and Reality confused because they do not know Reality and so have named and designed God to their own specifications and needs. One assumes that becoming God, becoming Reality is a process and that they are in the process. They see their lives as preparation for becoming God/Perfection. What lies behind or beneath the
creation of God other than the desire to become the other? We become what we dream and desire. When the desire is unknowable and unattainable, we create the image and pretend that we know what we have chosen. We desire Reality but it does not exist for creation, so we image it and call it God. We strive for the Perfection of the God we have created to represent our dreams and desires.

Post #177 "Transference into Reality"

Can transference take place if the one desired remains? How can one become the other if the other remains? If a transference truly takes place, how could the one desired remain? There is no way that the desired one could remain. So what becomes of that one, the other one, the one that was the object of desire? In the transference, does that one not lose identity and become 'no one'? Can transference truly take place if desired one remains? If Reality is what is desired, can desire alter Reality or does desire alter only the one desiring to become Reality, to become God? If Reality is desired, does this in any way change Reality? Of course not, there is no way creation can change Reality or even touch Reality in any way. For one reason, creation and Reality are not in the same level or same degree or same dimension, in other words, in the same mode of existence, for existence is not possible for image. As the host of the image, Reality can have an effect on creation for creation images Reality. Creation, however, as image, can have no effect on Reality. Yet, would not transference demand the removal, or better  yet, the death, of that other one. That other one that seems to stand in the way of creation achieving its goal of becoming God, of becoming the Reality. So, if that which is and is of creation desires to become God or become Reality, God and/or Reality must be removed. Creation must believe that the transference has been accomplished and God and/or Reality are gone and never existed. Creation must believe that it alone has all that was desired and dreamed about that was God, that was Reality. Creation must believe in its infallibility, its infiniteness, and in its entity.

On the side: Within creation, what if the one desired was a god? Could a god lose identity? What would become of the other one, thee one that was the object of the desire? What would become of that other one, the one that lost its identity? Can transference truly take place if one remains ? Can being desired alter Reality? Would not transference demand the death of that other one? What if that original was a god, could a god lose identity? History would prove that many gods have lost identity. Do we not, daily, come in contact with and hear about gods that have lost their identity? What is a god anyway, but that which is worshipped? When a god is no longer worshipped does that god then exist? Has transference taken place?

In projection, an image of an original or a host is projected onto a surface that seemingly changes the reflecting surface so that it is meant to resemble the original. In transference the reflecting surface becomes the original. The reflecting surface is that one desiring to become other than it is. Example:  A desires to become B through a transference of B's persona or B's essence onto A. Through transference, the image is seen to change places with the desired object. Ideally, if the transference went as planned, the one that desires would see itself as the Reality, but in the case of becoming God or becoming the Reality the one that desires becomes a distorted and inverted image . Actually, the opposite effect is all that is achieved. That which has now become image sees itself as having transferred and takes on the new role. It is, however,  only role playing. The transference never took place. At least not as planned and hoped for.

Post # 176 "Projection of Reality's Image"

Creation is the projected image of Reality. Can Reality be projected? Can Reality be projected or is it an impression of Reality which is projected, making creation the result of Intelligence's dreaming and desires? If Reality is able to be projected, Reality must be knowable or at least, readable. Is Reality knowable? Is Reality readable? Again, can Reality be projected or is the perception which designs its own impressions of Reality that is projected? Can Reality be known through its image or is the projected image of  Reality not Reality at all, but the image, the image which is the opposite, the distorted, the reversed, the inverted , and opposite of itself? Then, is creation that which Intelligence imagines or images? Projection requires a surface on to which to project an image. Of course, the projection of Reality onto a surface would be impossible and would result in great distortion. Besides the image being greatly distorted to the point of being unrecognizable, the image is distorted also through  the fact that surface of creation is not at all compatible to the projection of Reality. In fact, as afore mentioned, it is not possible to project Reality, only an impression can be projected so the result is great distortion and the reverse of what was expected. Reality can be known only through the image.....Reality is opposite creation, consequently, Reality cannot be comprehended. Creation longs to be as Reality, as intelligence longs to be its impression of its God. Although creation longs to be Reality, creation cannot even comprehend Reality. Where there is finiteness....infiniteness is longed for. Where there is brokenness, entity is longed for. Where there is no truth, truth is longed for. Creation does not know infiniteness. Creation does not know entity. Creation does not know Truth.

If Reality could be projected on to one that dreams, desires and chooses to become the Reality, to become God, would the planned transference take place? Would this desire, would this choice, would the resultant projection bring about the transference of one into another? What if the dreamer, the one who desires, the chooser, believes that the transference has taken place or is about to soon happen, would it not be much of what our existence is about here on earth, here in creation? Do we not already believe ourselves to possess God?

Post #175 "Lost Reality"

What is Real? What does Real mean? Have we confused what we think of as real with Reality itself? There is Reality and there is the image of Reality. We do not understand that if Reality exists, non-reality must also exist. To get any understanding of what is Real ,we must distinguish what is Real from what is the image of Reality. That which is created is not real but is image. Creation is the image of Reality. As Creation is created, creation exists in its own created Time, in its own created Place or surfaces, and in and on its own created Substance. But neither its Time, its Place, nor its Substance is the 'stuff'' of Reality. Image can only reflect in its own Time, Place, and in its own Substance all of which are nebulous and do not exist to Reality. Creation is made up of the dreams, desires, and the choice of Intelligence. Intelligence chooses. The function of Intelligence is Choosing. What is created begins and ends and consequently does not exist at all to and in Reality. Creation is image. To those in creation, to humanity, there is great confusion over God. Creation has created the God of Creation so consequently is unable to see that which is Reality and sees and replaces Reality with its God, god and gods...all representative of humanity itself. The God of Creation is the image of Reality. The transference had to be made to allow for Intelligence to become God for there lies deep within humanity the desire to become God. Intelligence can never become other than what it is for creation is image. As Creation is image, creation's God is image. Creation and its God are the image of Reality.

Intelligence Choose to become what it is not. The result is image...what Intelligence sees itself as. Intelligence creates Perfection and then tries to live in that perfection. So to, Intelligence creates God as Intelligence sees God as perfection. The result is the image of Reality, known as God. Would not an image be the distorted reproduction of its own efforts , thereby creating itself and providing for its own reality? Image is projected desire that forms matter from its own energy when coming in contact with is own created surface. Image is energy that grows from desire. Desire created the energy from which choice brings about created reality. Can an image that has resulted from projection of an interpretation of Reality onto a created surface be without distortion? Can Reality be projected in the first place? Can Reality be projected or is the 'imaged' reality that which is projected? If Reality could be projected on to Intelligence as in humanity, that humanity that desires and chooses, would the planned transference take place? Would this desire, would this choice, would this resulting projection, bring about the transference that would change one into another? What would happen, then, to the one who is the object of the desire and the choice. Could this 'primary', this desired Essence, still exist? Of course, it could not exist in the newly created scene of Time, Place and Substance with its image functioning as God of Creation. The deal of the transference is that only one remain. Only One can exist. The desired primary Essence must be dealt with...must be destroyed. A entirely new scene would result, for God is One. Only one God can remain. Creation can not deal with Reality so has removed Reality by erecting its walls of earth and galaxy, blocking any possible view of Reality. How could reality be seen if so desired? .......through religion?........through science?

Post #174 "Searching for Answers"

Is it possible to find answers to life's ultimate questions inside the confining walls of religion and science? Do religion and science hold, each within its own walls, the very essence of life...the very essence of existence? Can religion claim ultimate and exclusive truth? Can science claim ultimate and exclusive Truth? Since neither system claims reliance on the other or even a sincere cooperative effort or collaboration between each other, one could assume that each system has determined and claimed its own 'ultimateness' and exclusiveness, again proving the controversy is not reconcilable.

Can Reason be a determinate to the faculty of faith? Can Faith occur on a one party basis or does it take a giver and a receiver? Is Faith the acceptance, the unquestioned acceptance, of an other's experience or at least, opinion? Can Faith result in one's own personal and uninfluenced experience? Is Faith ever able to be tested by the search for evidence as in archaeological excavation? And then, does Faith become Reason if tested? Is Faith the result of imposed power over unsuspecting victims? Is Faith the victim of Reason? Is Faith dictated by the power of Reason, as in "you must believe and believe in, what I tell you or you are guilty of sin"? Does Reason seek a victim and threaten the victim to uphold dictates saying it must believe and abide under penalty of sin that which Reason has determined to suit its own use and need? Is Faith the result of threats for the sake of accumulating power over a victim? Does Reason, control in the long run-Faith? Is Faith blind? Does Faith accept and believe in that which Reason imposes or does Faith react to that which Reason imposes? Is Faith imposed under penalty of sin if not accepted and abided by? Is Faith the captive of Reason under duress? Is Intelligence free to accept the true data that is present to it? Can and does faith react or does faith rely solely on its own facts established through first party revelation? What of second and third party revelation?What about revelation that is based on the written word that has been written and rewritten, altered and transposed? Does Reason control that which is beneficial or that which is destructive or both?Does the power of reason build walls? Is Intelligence limited, imprisoned, or freed by Faith? Is Intelligence limited, imprisoned, or freed by Reason?

Does religious Faith control that which is beneficial or that which is destructive? Does the power of Faith build walls? Does Reason precede Faith? Does Reason provide the power tool that convinces, persuades, and effects Faith? is Faith the result of displays of power that effect and impress, persuade, and in many cases, threaten? Is Faith freely offered and freely accepted? Is Faith questionable or is faith infallible? Is not 'questioning' that which determines just what is Faith from what is Reason? What of trust? Does Reason allow for trust? Is it possible to have a Faith that is based on trust and not control? Where do we go for the answers to life's ultimate questions?