Post #64 "Words, Image, Creation, Non-Reality"

This entry begins with Word. A representation of Image is Word. Words form language and through the divisive action of creation, language breaks down into languages. Language breaks down into many, many languages over the course of the history of humanity (humanity-an image of Intelligence). Each language is a further testimony to the process of division that characterizes creation. Each language is a further breakdown into smaller and smaller pieces, as the breakdown of atoms into smaller and smaller subatomic particles. The words 'God' and 'God of Creation' represent and are image. These words do not represent Reality. These words cannot represent Reality. No words can represent Reality. Words and language are powerful symbols of who we are, what we think, and what we want to communicate and not the Reality we seek to represent. What is communicated, and especially what is not communicated, is extremely determinate in personal and interpersonal situations. Communication through words and through lack of words creates power and, consequently, further division.

The God of Creation was and is image. If the God of Creation is image, as is creation image, what is the Reality of what was imaged? What is that which is the Reality of God; God the Image? There is no way that the stuff of non-reality, in other words, the stuff of creation, can know facts or data from what could be referred to as an 'out of our comprehension' and a 'beyond our imagination' and beyond our dreaming, of Reality. We, certainly, cannot name it. We, certainly, cannot possess it. To attempt to do so is playing the games of biblical Genesis which we do not know how not to do. The Collective Consciousness has dreamt itself the God of Creation and has called itself and its world into being, but the Reality is beyond our dreams and reason. The Reality is beyond our mechanical world of mechanical thoughts by mechanical thinkers. We cannot know the Reality. We cannot collect data on Reality. We cannot possess the Reality. We can, however, be sure of the actuality of the Reality of Reality as we can be sure of the reality of non-reality, for if it were not so, nothing of our reality-nothing of our creation, would exist, because our reality does exist----for us. We can be sure of the Reality of Reality, for if it were not so, its image could not be our reality. If it were not so, we could rightly question our existence. For if it were not so, our image could not be our reality.