Post #54 "Language and God"

There are two, "That Which Is"-the Reality and "That Which Isn't"-the Reality, the image. The image created the impenetrable walls called creation. The Reality had no need to create that which is not Real. The Reality has no need to create that which came from darkness, from the abyss of Nothingness. Here is where language abysmally failed and fails. Language failed because those who built and hid behind walls spoke a language that could not define and confine That Reality-That Which Is, so how could appropriate and acceptable words be found in 'that which is not real' that could communicate 'that which is Real'? Who of those who chose to not hide behind the walls and were deeply aware of the Reality could possibly speak of that which was blocked and not admitted to? Who could ever describe the very thing that needed to be hidden and then destroyed that others could claim that which wasn't theirs to claim? Who could possibly know the name of this Reality, if indeed a name is appropriate and applicable? Who could ever claim the right to know, meaning to possess, the Reality? Yet the act of naming is an act of knowing and thereby possessing! How can the Unknowable be named, described, and thereby possessed by that which does not exist in the Reality of Reality?